Human factors analyses in aircraft MRO based on improved HFACS

• Civil Aviation • Previous Articles Next Articles

Human factors analyses in aircraft MRO based on improved HFACS

WU Yaogang¹, XU Jianxin¹, MA Chao¹, HAO Rui²

1. College of Aeronautical Engineering, CAUC, Tianjin 300300, China;2. General Aviation Branch, China Air Transportation Association, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2018-03-07 Revised:2018-05-20 Online:2018-10-25 Published:2018-11-19

Abstract

Abstract: In order to reduce the influence of human factors in aircraft MRO, typical aircraft accidents of a domestic company are analyzed. The improved HFACS model for aircraft MRO is constructed, which can analyze the human factors more effectively with its 17 subcategories. SPSS is employed for chi-square test and odd ratio analysis. Results show that the organization influence is the main cause of accidents, meanwhile, there exists significant causal relation among organization influence, unsafe supervision, premise of unsafe behavior and unsafe behaviors. The correlation between sub-categories should be given more attention in order to fundamentally reduce the occurrence of human factor events.

Key words: aircraft maintenance, human factor, improved HFACS, chi-square test, odd ratio

CLC Number:

WU Yaogang, XU Jianxin, MA Chao, HAO Rui. Human factors analyses in aircraft MRO based on improved HFACS[J]. .

References 16

1]	HAWKINSF.Human Factorsin Flight[M].Oxford, UK:Routledge. 1993.
[2]	Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Aircraft Accident-Worldwide Operations 1991-2001[R]. 2002.
[3]	刘加明. 关于飞行训练中的驾驶舱资源管理的探究[J].军民两用技术与产品, 2016(10): 13.
[4]	REASON J援Human error: Models and management[J].Western Journal of Medicine, 2000, 172(6): 393.
[5]	苟立俊. 航空维修人为因素数据管理系统的设计与实现[D]. 成都:电子科技大学，2011.
[6]	张鑫. 民航空管安全体系研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2005.
[7]	CAAC‘Aircraft Maintenance HumanFactors’DiscussionGroup.Human Factors Case Set: Civil Aircraft Maintenance Error[M].Beijing: China
	Civil Aviation Press，2003.
[8]	王华伟. 基于人为因素的民航维修安全分析与评估研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2009.
[9]	曹兵兵. 民航维修基地人为差错控制能力评价研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2014.
[10]	刘鹏. 加强规范化管理减少人为因素对航空安全的负面影响[J].中国民航飞行学院学报, 2001, 12(4): 6-7.
[11]	凌晓熙.人为因素对航空安全影响的研究[J]. 中国科技信息, 2007(9):87-89.
[12]	王建豪, 傅贵, 闫明伟, 等. HFACS 与24 Model: 不安全动作原因的对比研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2017, 17(2): 586-590.
[13]	卜晓敏. 航空人为因素事故/事件分析模型研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2008.
[14]	SHAPPELL S A, WIEGMANN D A援The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS[J]. American Libraries, 2000, 1(1): 20-46.
[15]	WIEGMANN D A, SHAPPELL S A援Applying the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to the Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accident Data[C]//11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, 2001: 1-6.
[16]	刘雅，张力，胡鸿. 基于改进的HFACS 电力生产事故人因分析[J]. 价值工程, 2017, 36(15): 240-242.

[1]	HE Zhenpeng , YAO Lianzheng , LIU Quan , LI Baichun , XIN Jia , ZHAO Fuxing. Research on simulated maintenance system of civil aircraft under dual-mode [J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2024, 42(4): 71-76.
[2]	HE Yongbo, ZHAO Baoxi. Indoor four-cable traction positioning and cable length solution [J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2022, 40(5): 39-44.
[3]	WANG Yonggang , ZUO Beichen. Risk identification and interactive risk assessment of 4C inspection based on HHM-RFRM [J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2022, 40(3): 41-46.
[4]	YUAN Leping. Correlation among air traffic controllers‘’fatigue, workload and error [J]. , 2018, 36(6): 31-33.
[5]	TAN Zhaoyang. Human factor analyses on dispatch based on AHP [J]. , 2017, 35(4): 54-57.
[6]	WANG Qun,GENG Hong. Interaction of aircraft maintenance simulation heterogeneous data based on XML [J]. , 2015, 33(4): 20-24.
[7]	LIU Yan-hong,BI Li-ge. Evaluation of aircraft maintenance mechanics'competency based on matter element analysis and entropy weight [J]. , 2015, 33(2): 28-31,40.