Analysis of factors affecting terminal safety resilience based on


	DEMATEL-ISM model

Abstract

Abstract:

To promote the construction of terminal safety resilience and improve the level of terminal safety management, the

concept of "safety resilience" is introduced into terminal safety management, and the factors affecting the safety resilience of the terminal are analyzed using the integrated method of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory

(DEMATEL) and interpretative structural model (ISM). Firstly, the definition of terminal safety resilience is proposed, and the indicator system of terminal safety resilience influencing factors is constructed centered on the monitoring ability, resistance ability, emergency response ability and recovery ability demonstrated with its operation.

Then, the DEMATEL-ISM model is established, and the DEMATEL method is used to calculate the degree of influence, the degree of being influenced, the degree of center, the degree of cause, and the causal attributes between

the factors, and the ISM method is used to divide their hierarchical structure. Finally, Terminal A of a domestic airport is taken as an example for model validation. The results indicate that the fundamental influencing factor of terminal safety resilience is the establishment of a terminal safety resilience mechanism, which is consistent with the

actual operation of Terminal A. This validates the effectiveness and reliability of the model and provides decision making and theoretical support for terminal safety management.

Key words:

terminal, safety resilience, decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), interpretative structural

model (ISM)

CLC Number:

V351

SONG Yang a , WANG Ruiqi b , ZHANG Peng b.

Analysis of factors affecting terminal safety resilience based on

DEMATEL-ISM model

[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2025, 43(2): 52-57.

References 22

	[1]
	HOLLNAGEL E, LEONHARDT J, LICU T, et al． From safety-Ⅰ to
	safety-Ⅱ: a white paper[R]． Brussels: Eurocontrol, 2013.
[2]	齐晓云, 李文磊, 刘杰．考虑非适应性疏散行为的航站楼应急疏
散[J]	．科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(7): 3106-3114．
[3]	史跃亚, 孙唯, 黄江涛．基于博弈理论的航站楼安检区疏散仿真
	优化[J]．计算机仿真, 2022, 39(7): 48-53．
	[4]
	HOLLNAGEL E． Is safety a subject for science?[J]． Safety Science, 2014,
	67: 21-24．
[5]	黄弘, 范维澄．构建“安全韧性城市”：概念、理论与实施路径[J]．北
	京行政学院学报, 2024(2): 1-9．
	[6]
	ADJETEY-BAHUN K, BIRREGAH B, CH魦TELET E, et al． A model to
	quantify the resilience of mass railway transportation systems [J]．
	Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016, 153: 1-14．
[7]	汪洋, 黄金辉, 付姗姗, 等．系统安全的思维转型: 风险与韧性的
	比较研究[J]．中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1): 62-68．
[8]	黄浪, 吴超, 杨冕, 等．韧性理论在安全科学领域中的应用[J]．
	中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 1-6．
[9]	黄浪, 吴超, 王秉．系统安全韧性的塑造与评估建模[J]．中国
	安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(12): 15-21．
[10]	罗通元．安全韧性学基本概念和理论体系探讨[J]．安全与环境学报,
	2022, 22(1): 280-291．
[11]	RANASINGHE U, JEFFERIES M, DAVIS P, et al． Resilience engineer－
	ing indicators and safety management: a systematic review[J]． Safety and
	Health at Work, 2020, 11(2): 127-135．
[12]	郭九霞．新一代民航运输系统安全韧性理论与方法研究[D]．成都:
	电子科技大学, 2021．
[13]	ZHU Z, YUAN J F, SHAO Q H, et al． Developing key safety manage－
	ment factors for construction projects in China: a resilience perspective
[J]	． International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
	2020, 17(17): 6167．
[14]	TANG B, GUO S Y, LI J C, et al． Exploring the risk transmission char－
	acteristics among unsafe behaviors within urban railway construction ac－
	cidents[J]． Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2022, 28(6):
	443-456．
[15]	詹承豫, 高叶, 徐明婧．系统韧性: 一个统筹发展与安全的核心概
念[J]	．广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(4): 17-32．
[16]	王欠欠．工程项目安全管理弹性水平评价及提升策略研究[D]．郑州:
	郑州大学, 2021．
[17]	卞斌彬, 黄玉庆, 刘志坚, 等. 基于双重预防机制的安全评价指标体
	系构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(S1): 45-50.
[18]	GABUS A, FONTELA E. World problem, an invitation to further thought
	within the framework of DEMATEL[M]. Geneva: Battelle Institute, Geneva Research Center, 1972．
[19]	黄亚江, 李书全, 李益锌, 等．基于 DEMATEL-ISM-ANP 的地铁运
	营安全韧性综合评价[J]．中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(6): 171-177．
[20]	岳仁田, 韩亚雄．航空公司安全风险因素分析的 DEMATEL-ISM 模
	型研究[J]．安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(6): 2091-2097．
[21]	李维昌．韧性视角下关系治理对建设项目绩效的影响研究[D]．济南:
	山东建筑大学, 2022．
[22]	詹承豫, 徐培洋．基于系统韧性的大安全大应急框架: 概念逻辑与
	建设思路[J]．中国行政管理, 2023, 39(8): 137-144．

Analysis of factors affecting terminal safety resilience based on

DEMATEL-ISM model

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 22

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments