基于可拓云模型的航站楼运行韧性评价

中国民航大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 61-66.

基于可拓云模型的航站楼运行韧性评价

程国勇，陈实

中国民航大学交通科学与工程学院，天津 300300

收稿日期:2023-01-09 修回日期:2023-03-10 出版日期:2025-04-08 发布日期:2025-04-08
作者简介:程国勇（1971— ），男，河北衡水人，教授，博士，研究方向为机场运行、机场工程
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2021YFB2600500）

Terminal operation resilience evaluation based on extension cloud model

CHENG Guoyong, CHEN Shi

College of Transportation Science and Engineering, CAUC, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2023-01-09 Revised:2023-03-10 Online:2025-04-08 Published:2025-04-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提高航站楼应对突发事件的能力，保证机场持续安全平稳运行，引入航站楼运行韧性概念并进行韧性评

价十分必要。本文针对现有航站楼运行韧性评价过程中存在随机性、模糊性以及评价指标难以定量表达的问

题，首先，从鲁棒性、快速性、冗余性和谋略性 4 个韧性基本属性出发，选取 18 个指标构建航站楼运行韧性

评价指标体系；其次，通过层次分析法（AHP，analytic hierarchy process）进行指标赋权，然后基于可拓云模型

构建航站楼运行韧性综合评价模型；最后，以北方某机场航站楼为例进行验证，结果表明：该机场航站楼运行

韧性综合得分为 4.362 3 分，为中高韧性。本文提出的航站楼运行韧性综合评价模型可为航站楼运行韧性评

价提供参考。

关键词:

航站楼, 韧性评价, 层次分析法（AHP）, 可拓云模型

Abstract:

In order to improve the ability of terminal to respond to emergencies and ensure the continuous safe and stable operation of the airport, it is necessary to introduce the concept of terminal operation resilience and conduct resilience

evaluation. This paper is aiming at the problems of randomness and fuzziness in the existing terminal operation resilience evaluation process and the difficulty of quantitative expression of evaluation indicators. Firstly, starting

from the four basic attributes of resilience, including robustness, rapidity, redundancy and strategicity, 18 indicators are selected to construct an evaluation index system of terminal operation resilience. Secondly, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to assign weights to indicators, and then the comprehensive evaluation model of terminal operation resilience is constructed based on the extension cloud model. Finally, taking the terminal of a

northern airport as an example for verification, the results show that the comprehensive score of terminal operation

resilience of the airport was 4.362 3 points, which is medium to high resilience. The comprehensive evaluation

model of terminal operation resilience proposed in this article can provide reference for the evaluation of terminal

operation resilience.

Key words:

terminal, resilience evaluation, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), extension cloud model

中图分类号:

V351.17

程国勇, 陈实.

基于可拓云模型的航站楼运行韧性评价

[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2024, 42(6): 61-66.

CHENG Guoyong, CHEN Shi.

Terminal operation resilience evaluation based on extension cloud model

[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2024, 42(6): 61-66.

参考文献 13

	[1]
	HUANG C N, LIOU J J H, LO H W, et al． Building an assessment model
	for measuring airport resilience[J]． Journal of Air Transport Management,
	2021, 95: 102101．
	[2]
	BAO D W, ZHANG X L． Measurement methods and influencing mechanisms for the resilience of large airports under emergency events[J]． Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 2018, 14(10): 855-880．
[3]	黄润建．基于风险交互分析的 4F 机场灾害韧性评价研究[D]．广州:
	暨南大学, 2020．
[4]	包艺翔. 公路隧道施工安全韧性评价及提升策略研究[D]. 北京: 北
	京建筑大学, 2022.
[5]	廖琦．装配式建筑施工阶段安全管理评价研究[D]．南宁: 广西大学,
	2022．
	[6]
	刘兴兴．西北地区城市韧性评价及影响机理研究[D]．南京: 南京师
	范大学, 2021: 35-38．
	[7]
	BRUNEAU M, CHANG S E, EGUCHI R T, et al． A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]． Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19(4): 733-752．
	[8]
	METZNER N． Simulation based analysis of airport terminal resilience
	with a generic terminal model[C]//AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM．
	Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 2020: AIAA2020-2917．
[9]	中国民用航空局. 民用运输机场突发事件应急救援管理规则:
	CCAR-139-II-R1[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2011.
[10]	中国民用航空总局．民用航空运输机场飞行区消防设施: MH/T
	7015—2007[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空总局, 2007．
[11]	国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会．民用运输机场应
	急救护设施设备配备: GB 18040—2019[S]．北京: 中国标准出版社,
	2019．
[12]	黄知超, 谢霞, 王斌．结合模糊综合评判与决策的电力系统状
	态估计[J]．电力系统保护与控制, 2015, 43(7): 65-69．
[13]	钟世炼．公路隧道工程施工系统韧性评价研究[D]．重庆: 重庆交通
	大学, 2021．