设置绕行滑行道对机场运行的影响分析———以上海浦东国际机场为例

中国民航大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 29-33.

设置绕行滑行道对机场运行的影响分析———以上海浦东国际机场为例

林有超，唐小卫

（南京航空航天大学民航学院，南京 211106）

出版日期:2019-12-31 发布日期:2019-12-31
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项（NS2016067）；国家自然科学基金项目（61603178）

Influence of end-around taxiway on airport operation: take PVG for instance

LIN Youchao, TANG Xiaowei

（College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China）

Online:2019-12-31 Published:2019-12-31
About author:林有超（1995—），男，天津人，硕士研究生，研究方向为机场规划设计与运行管理.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 设置绕行滑行道是提升机场飞行区安全、提高跑道容量和地面滑行效率的重要手段。以停机位预指派结果为基础，对设置绕行滑行道后的机场运行状况进行分析，并细化至各停机位。首先探讨了上海浦东国际机场渊PVG冤窄距平行跑道设置绕行滑行道的条件及运行规则，然后利用Flexsim 模拟了两种情景下渊设置绕滑和不设置绕滑冤上海浦东国际机场高峰小时航空器的滑行时间和该组窄距平行跑道的容量。结果表明：绕行滑行道的使用率为21.7%，进港航班平均滑行时间由8.11 min 减至7.81 min。该组窄距平行跑道在“内起外降”模式下的容量由47.59 架/h 增至51.11 架/h，增幅为7.40%。

关键词: 绕行滑行道, 滑行时间, 跑道容量, Flexsim

Abstract: EAT setting is an important approach to improve the airport flight zone safety, runway capacity and taxiing efficiency. Based on the gate pre-assignment result, airport operation with EAT is analyzed and refined to each gate. Firstly, the conditions and operational rules of EAT setting in narrow parallel runway at PVG is investigated.And then, Flexsim is used to simulate the aircraft taxiing time and the narrow parallel runway capacity during peak hours with and without EAT respectively. Results show that the EAT utilization rate is 21.7% and the average taxiing time has been reduced from 8.11 min to 7.81 min. The narrow parallel runway capacity has been increased from 47.59 racks/h to 51.11 racks/h in the mode of ’Taking-off inside and landing outside‘and the increasing rate is 7.40%.

Key words: end-around taxiway, taxiing time, runway capacity, Flexsim

中图分类号:

V352

林有超, 唐小卫. 设置绕行滑行道对机场运行的影响分析———以上海浦东国际机场为例[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2019, 37(6): 29-33.

LIN Youchao, TANG Xiaowei. Influence of end-around taxiway on airport operation: take PVG for instance[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2019, 37(6): 29-33.

参考文献 13

[1]	SATYAMURTIS D, MATTINGLYS P. Implementing a perimeter taxiway at Dallas/Fort Worth international airport evaluation of operating policy impacts[D]. Arlington: University of Texas, 2007: 23-34.
[2]	ENGELLAND S A, RUSZKOWSKI L M. Analysis of DFW perimeter taxiway operations[C]//10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration,and Operations Conference, Fort Worth, Texas, Sep13-15, 2010-9150:1-14.
[3]	UDAY P, BURDER D, MARAISK B. Environmental benefits of endaround taxiway operations[C]//11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Virginia Beach, VA, Sep20-22,2011-7049: 1-18.
[4]	MASSIDDA A, MATTINGLY S P. Empirical assessment of the endaround taxiway’s operational benefits at Dallas/Fort Worth international airport using ASDE- X data[C]//Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting Washington DC, Jan 13-17, 2013: 29-41.
[5]	LE T T, MARAIS K. Optimization of end-around taxiway for efficient operations and environmental benefits[C]//2013 AIAA Aviation Technology,Integration,andOperationsConference,LosAngeles,CA,Aug12-14, 2013-4313: 1-15.
[6]	宿百岩. 绕行滑行道应用初探[J]. 上海空港, 2009, 10: 30-33.
[7]	刘晏滔. 虹桥机场绕滑运行模式探讨[J]. 上海空港, 2013, 17: 19-26.
[8]	熊文娟. 民用机场绕行滑行道规划与运行研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2014.
[9]	王维, 熊文娟. 设置绕行滑行道时的机场运行效率分析[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2015, 33（2）: 14-17.
[10]	徐婷, 胡明华, 赵征. 绕行滑行道运行效益分析[J]. 航空计算技术, 2015, 45（4）: 112-115.
[11]	王维, 李龙. 机场绕行滑行道运行策略及应用研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2016, 33（6）: 119-122.
[12]	上海国际机场股份有限公司. 上海国际机场股份有限公司2017 年年度报告[R]. 上海: 上海国际机场股份有限公司, 2017.
[13]	王维, 李伟. 机场近距平行跑道一起一降模式下的容量计算[J].中国民航大学学报, 2009, 27（3）: 20-22.