基于系统安全的低空装备适航技术及标准研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着低空领域新场景、新技术的不断涌现，以往传统构型航空器适航标准的经验作用显著减弱，亟须建立

适应未来低空航空器发展需求的适航标准体系。本文系统梳理了国内外低空装备适航标准的发展现状和

未来趋势，详细分析了航空领域安全技术的演变历程和当前形势。在此基础上，本文提出了具备“系统安

全统领”“对象类型无关”“基于安全效果的规章”和“多种符合性路径”特征的低空装备适航标准体系新

架构。该架构有助于应对低空新场景、新技术及其复杂多样性和快速演进性等问题，为低空装备适航标准

体系建设给出了指导框架建议，也有力支撑了下一代国际适航标准的中国方案实施。

关键词:

低空装备, 适航技术, 适航标准, 系统安全, 标准体系架构

Abstract:

With the continuous emergence of new scenarios and technologies in the low-altitude field, the effectiveness of

previous experience with airworthiness standards for traditional aircraft configuration has significantly diminished. Thus, it is urgent to establish an airworthiness standard system that meets the development needs of low altitude aircraft in the future. This paper systematically reviewed the current status and future trends of airworthiness standards for low-altitude equipment both domestically and internationally, and detailedly analyzed the development history and current situation of safety technologies in the aviation field. On this basis, a new airworthiness standard system framework for low-altitude equipment was proposed, with features of system safety leadership, object type independence, safety effect-based regulations, and multiple compliance pathways. This framework helps to address issues such as low-altitude new scenarios, new technologies, their complexity, diversity,

and rapid evolution. It provides guidance and framework suggestions for the construction of low-altitude equipment airworthiness standard system, and offers strong support for implementing China's approach to next-generation international airworthiness standards.

Key words:

low-altitude equipment, airworthiness technology, airworthiness standards, system safety, standard system

framework

中图分类号:

V216

丁水汀, 綦蕾 a, 李果 b, 邱天 a, 李大庆 .

基于系统安全的低空装备适航技术及标准研究

[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2025, 43(5): 1-15.

DING Shuiting , QI Lei a , LI Guob , QIU Tiana , LI Daqing.

Research on airworthiness technology and standards for low-altitude equipment

based on system safety

[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2025, 43(5): 1-15.

参考文献 99

[1]	中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 国家综合立体交通网规划纲要[J].
	中华人民共和国国务院公报, 2021(8): 25-37.
[2]	李强. 政府工作报告—2024 年 3 月 5 日在第十四届全国人民代
	表大会第二次会议上[N]. 人民日报, 2024-03-06(3).
[3]	中共中央. 中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革、推进中国式现代化
	的决定[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2024.
[4]	中国民用航空局, 国家发展和改革委员会, 交通运输部.“十四五”
	民用航空发展规划[EB/OL]. (2021-12-14)[2025-09-20]. https://
	www.caac.gov.cn/PHONE/XXGK_17/XXGK/FZGH/202201/t20220107_
	210798. html.
[5]	中国民用航空局. 关于成立民航局通用航空和低空经济工作领导
	小组的通知: 民航函〔2025〕481 号[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2025.
[6]	中国航空学会. 2024 低空经济场景白皮书: v1.0[R]. 北京: 中国航
	空学会, 2024.
[7]	HILL B P, D E CARME D, METCALFE M, et al. UAM vision concept
	of operations (ConOps) UAM maturity level (UML) 4 version 1.0:
	Report No. 20205011091[R]. Washington DC: NASA, 2020.
[8]	GOYAL R, REICHE C, FERNANDO C, et al. Urban air mobility market
	study[R]. Washington DC: NASA, 2018.
[9]	WANG K, QU X B. Urban aerial mobility: reshaping the future of urban
	transportation[J]. The Innovation, 2023, 4(2): 100392.
[10]	YAN Y P, WANG K, QU X B. Urban air mobility (UAM) and ground
	transportation integration: a survey[J]. Frontiers of Engineering Manage－
	ment, 2024, 11(4): 734-758.
[11]	KABASHKIN I, MISNEVS B, ZERVINA O. Artificial intelligence in
	aviation: new professionals for new technologies[J]. Applied Sciences,
	2023, 13(21): 11660.
[12]	YANG C Y, HUANG C Y. Natural language processing (NLP) in avia－
	tion safety: systematic review of research and outlook into the future[J].
	Aerospace, 2023, 10(7): 600.
[13]	FAA. Urban air mobility (UAM) concept of operations (ConOps): version
	2. 0[R]. Washington DC: FAA, 2023.
[14]	EASA. U-space ConOps and architecture:edition 4.0[R]. Cologne :
	EASA, 2023.
[15]	FAA. Hydrogen-fueled aircraft safety and certification roadmap[R].
	Washington DC: FAA, 2024.
[16]	FAA. Roadmap for advanced air mobility aircraft type certification: edition 1. 0[R]. Washington DC: FAA, 2025.
[17]	FAA. Technical report on propulsion system and auxiliary power unit
	(APU) related aircraft safety hazards[R]. Washington DC: FAA, 1999.
[18]	FAA. 2nd technical report on propulsion system and auxiliary power unit (APU) related aircraft safety hazards[R]. Washington DC: FAA,
	2005.
[19]	FAA. 3rd technical report on propulsion system and auxiliary power unit (APU) related aircraft safety hazards [R]. Washington DC: FAA, 2017.
[20]	FAA. FAR Part 33. 76 amendment 33-36 brid ingestion[S]. Washington
	DC: FAA, 2023.
[21]	ICAO. Doc 9859 safety management manual: 4th edition[S]. Montreal:
	ICAO, 2018.
[22]	EASA. CS-23 amendment 5 certification specifications for normal-category aeroplanes[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2017.
[23]	FAA. FAR Part 23 amendment 23-64 airworthiness standards: normal
	category airplanes[S]. Washington DC: FAA, 2017.
[24]	EASA. Acceptable means of comliance and guidance material to certification specifications for normal-category aeroplanes: issue 1[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2017.
[25]	FAA. FAA accepted means of compliance process for 14 CFR part 23:
	AC 23. 2010-1[S]. Washington DC: FAA, 2017.
[26]	中国民用航空局. 正常类飞机适航规定: CCAR-23-R4[S]. 北京:
	中国民用航空局, 2022.
[27]	中国民用航空局. 正常类飞机审定: AC-23-AA-2022-01[S]. 北京:
	中国民用航空局, 2022.
[28]	ICAO. Doc 9760 airworthiness manual: 4th edition[S]. Montreal: ICAO,
	2020.
[29]	国际民航组织. 无人航空器系统规章的制定[EB/OL]. [2025-09-20].
	https://www.icao.int/safety/UA/UASToolkit/Pages/Narrative-Regulation_
	zh.aspx
[30]	MCGRAW J W. Unmanned aircraft systems operations in the U.S. national airspace system-interim operational approval guidance: AFS-400
	UAS Policy 05-01[S]. Washington DC: Department of Transportation,
	FAA, 2005.
[31]	FAA. Small unmanned aircraft systems (sUAS): AC 107-2[S]. Washington DC: FAA, 2016.
[32]	FAA. Airworthiness certification of unmanned aircraft systems and optionally piloted aircraft: Order 8130.34D[S]. Washington DC: FAA,
	2017.
[33]	FAA. FAR part 21.17 amendment 21-107 designation of applicable
	regulations[S]. Washington DC: FAA, 2024.
[34]	李凯, 陆崑, 丁晓宇, 等. 欧美无人驾驶航空器系统适航管理政
	策解读及启示[J]. 航空维修与工程, 2018(5): 94-96.
[35]	European Union. Common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency: Regulation (EC) No. 216/
	2008[S]. Brussels: European Union, 2008.
[36]	EASA. Policy statement airworthiness certification of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS): E.Y013-01[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2009.
[37]	European Commission. Roadmap for the integration of civil remotelypiloted aircraft systems into the European aviation system[R]. Brussels:European Commission, 2013.
[38]	EASA. Introduction of a regulatory framework for the operation of
	drones: A-NPA 2015-10[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2015.
[39]	European Union. Commission delegated regulation (EU) on unmanned
	aircraft systems and on third -country operators of unmanned aircraft
	systems: 2019/945[S]. Brussels: European Union, 2019.
[40]	European Union. Commission implementing regulation (EU) on the
	rules and proceduresfor the operation of unmanned aircraft: 2019/947 [S].
	Brussels: European Union, 2019.
[41]	EASA. Acceptable means of compliance (AMC) and guidance material
(GM)	to part-UAS: UAS operations in the ′open′ and ′specific′ categories[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2019.
[42]	EASA. Acceptable means of compliance (AMC) and guidance material
(GM)	to commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/947: issue l[S].
	Cologne: EASA, 2019.
[43]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 关于民用无人机管理有关问
	题的暂行规定: ALD2009022[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2009.
[44]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 民用无人驾驶航空器实名制
	登记管理规定: AP-45-AA-2017-03[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2017.
[45]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 基于运行风险的无人机适航
	审定指导意见: 民航适发〔2019〕3 号[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2019.
[46]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 关于发布高风险货运固定翼
	无人机系统适航标准（试行）的通知: 民航适发〔2020〕1 号[S]. 北京:中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2020.
[47]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 关于发布中高风险无人直升
	机系统适航标准（试行）的通知: 民航适发〔2020〕7 号[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2020.
[48]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 民用无人驾驶航空器系统适航审定分级分类和系统安全性分析指南: AC-21-AA-2022-40[S].北京: 中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2022.
[49]	Japan Civil Aviation Bureau. Proposal to ICAO for taking a leadership
	toward global harmonization on eVTOL[R]. Tokyo: Japan Civil AviationBureau, 2022.
[50]	Japan Civil Aviation Bureau. Proposal for acceleration of standardiza－
	tion at the ICAO fot electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL)[R].Tokyo: Japan Civil Aviation Bureau 2024.
[51]	National Civil Aviation Agency of Brazil. Electric vertical take-off and
	landing (eVTOL) aircraft product certification and operational aspects[R].
	Sao Paulo: National Civil Aviation Agency of Brazil, 2024.
[52]	FAA. Airworthiness criteria: special class, airworthiness criteria for the
	Joby Aero, Inc. Model JAS4-1 Powered-Lift[S]. Washington DC: FAA,2024.
[53]	FAA. Airworthiness criteria: special class, airworthiness criteria for the
	Archer Aviation, Inc. Model M001 Powered-Lift[S]. Washington DC:FAA, 2024.
[54]	FAA. Special conditions: magniX USA, Inc., magni350 and magni650
	model engines: 33-022-SC[S]. Washington DC: FAA, 2021.
[55]	FAA. FAR Part 1.1 general definitions[S]. Washington DC: FAA, 2025.
[56]	FAA. 4 type certification-powered-lift: Draft AC 21.17[S]. Washingon DC: FAA, 2024.
[57]	FAA. Safety continuum for powered-lift: Draft PS-AIR 21.17-01[S].
	Washington DC: FAA, 2024.
[58]	FAA. 4 type certification-powered-lift: AC 21. 17[S]. Washington DC:FAA, 2025.
[59]	FAA. Special class rotorcraft: Draft PS-AIR 21.17-02[S]. Washington DC: FAA, 2024.
[60]	EASA. Special condition for small-category VTOL aircraft: SC-VTOL-01[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2019.
[61]	EASA. Means of compliance with the special condition VTOL: MOC SC-VTOL[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2021.
[62]	EASA. Means of compliance with the special condition VTOL: MOC-2
	SC-VTOL[S]. Cologne: easa, 2022.
[63]	EASA. Means of compliance with the special condition VTOL: MOC-3
	SC-VTOL[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2022.
[64]	EASA. Means of compliance with the special condition VTOL: MOC-4
	SC-VTOL[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2023.
[65]	EASA. Special condition for small-category VTOL aircraft: SC-VTOL-
	02[S]. Cologne: EASA, 2024.
[66]	EASA. Electric /hybrid propulsion system: SC E-19 [S]. Cologne :
	EASA, 2021.
[67]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 沃飞 AE200-100 型电动垂直
	起降航空器专用条件（征求意见稿）: SC-21-006[S]. 北京: 中国民用
	航空局航空器适航审定司, 2023.
[68]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 城市场景物流电动多旋翼无
	人驾驶航空器（轻小型）系统技术要求: MH/T 6126—2022[S]. 北京:
	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2022.
[69]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 亿航 EH216-S 型无人驾驶航
	空器系统专用条件: SC-21-002[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2022.
[70]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. V2000CG 型无人驾驶航空器
	系统专用条件: SC-21-004[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2023.
[71]	中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司. 电推进系统专用条件编制指
	南: AC-21-AA-2024-20[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局航空器适航审定司, 2024.
[72]	ICAO. Safety management manua（l 4th Edition）: Doc 9859[S]. Montreal: ICAO, 2018.
[73]	SHALEV D M, TIRAN J. Condition-based fault tree analysis (CBFTA):
	a new method for improved fault tree analysis (FTA), reliability and
	safety calculations[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007,92(9): 1231-1241.
[74]	KAISER B, GRAMLICH C, FORSTER M. State/event fault trees: a safety analysis model for software-controlled systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(11): 1521-1537.
[75]	PEETERS J F W, BASTEN R J I, TINGA T. Improving failure analysis
	efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2018, 172:36-44.
[76]	DUNJO J, FTHENAKIS V, VILCHEZ J A, et al. Hazard and operability
	(HAZOP) analysis. A literature review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 173(1/2/3): 19-32.
[77]	ANTONELLO F, BUONGIORNO J, ZIO E. A methodology to perform
	dynamic risk assessment using system theory and modeling and simulation: application to nuclear batteries[J]. Reliability Engineering &System Safety, 2022, 228: 108769.
[78]	LI Y, LIU P D, LI G. An asymmetric cost consensus based failure mode
	and effect analysis method with personalized risk attitude information
[J]	Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 235: 109196.
[79]	SAE. Guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment
	process on civil airborne systems and equipment: ARP4761-1996 [S].
	Washington DC: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1996.
[80]	LEVESON N G. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to
	safety[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2011.
[81]	SHARVIA S, PAPADOPOULOS Y. Integrating model checking with
	HiP-HOPS in model-based safety analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering
	& System Safety, 2015, 135: 64-80.
[82]	GOMEZ-ANDRADES A, MUNOZ P, SERRANO I, et al. Automatic root
	cause analysis for LTE networks based on unsupervised techniques[J].
	IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , 2016, 65 (4): 2369 -2386.
[83]	HU Y P, PENG Q B, NI Q, et al. Event-based safety and reliability
	analysis integration in model-based space mission design[J]. Reliability
	Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 229: 108866.
[84]	LI D Q, YAO A Z, FENG K F, et al. Next frontiers of aviation safety:
	system-of-systems safety[J]. Engineering, 2025, 52: 262-277.
[85]	李大庆. 基于核心技术破解低空体系未知风险[EB/OL]. (2024-08-
19)	[2025-09-10]. http: //education. news. cn/20240819/78a6db48d0b
	14e17a88901f153f964a9/c. html.
[86]	SAE. Certification considerations for highly-integrated or complex aircraft systems: ARP4754-1996 [S]. Washington DC: SAE, 1996.
[87]	SAE International. Guidelines for development of civil aircraft and systems: ARP-4754-2010 [S]. Washington DC: SAE International, 2010.
[88]	SAE International. Guidelines for conducting the safety assessment process on civil aircraft, systems, and equipment: ARP4761-2023[S]. Washington DC: SAE International, 2023.
[89]	RTCA. Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification: DO-178C-2011[S]. Washington DC: RTCA, 2011.
[90]	RTCA. Design assurance guidance for airborne electronic hardware:
	DO-254-2000[S]. Washington DC: RTCA, 2000.
[91]	MHENNI F, CHOLEY J Y, NGUYEN N, et al. Flight control system
	modeling with SysML to support validation, qualification and certification[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016, 49(3): 453-458.
[92]	SIRGABSOU Y, BARON C, PAHUN L, et al. Model-driven engineering to ensure automotive embedded software safety. methodological proposal and case study[J]. Computers in Industry, 2022, 138: 103636.
[93]	丁水汀, 刘晓锋, 罗晨爽, 等. 航空发动机控制系统适航安全性[M].北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2024.
[94]	丁水汀, 李果, 周惠敏. 航空发动机限寿件适航的五大问题[M].北京: 科学出版社, 2025.
[95]	丁水汀, 李果, 邱天, 等. 航空发动机安全性设计导论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2019.
[96]	LISAGOR O, KELLY T, NIU R. Model-based safety assessment: review
	of the discipline and its challenges[C]//2011 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, June 12 -15, 2011,Guiyang, China. IEEE, 2011: 625-632.
[97]	LI Y, GONG Q, SU D. Model-based safety assessment of aircraft power
	plant[C]//3rd International Symposium on Aircraft Airworthiness, Toulouse, France, 2013.
[98]	LI G, TENG Y D, WANG Z L, et al. A method for automatic generating
	safety analysis based on aviation piston engine model[C]//34th Congress
	of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Florence, Italy, 2024.
[99]	MA Q L, DING S T, QIU T, et al. A multidisciplinary model-based
	engine rotor integrity assessment approach derived from system safety
	requirements[M]// FU S. 2023 Asia-Pacific International Symposium
	on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2023 ) Proceedings. Singapore :
	Springer, 2016: 1133-1153.
	[100] 李志平, 孙泽锜, 朱星宇, 等. 基于喘振/失速的航空发动机系统
	安全评估方法[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(8): 488-499.
	[101] SONG X Y, QI L, LIU S Y, et al. Simple analysis of complex system safety based on finite state machine network and phase space theory[J].
	Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2024, 249: 110205.
	[102] FAA. Roadmap for artificial intelligence safety assurance: version I[R].Washington DC: FAA, 2024.
	[103] EASA. Artificial intelligence roadmap 1.0: a human-centric approach
	to AI in aviation[R]. Cologne: EASA 2020.
	[104] PARK P S, GOLDSTEIN S, O′GARA A, et al. AI deception: a survey of
	examples, risks, and potential solutions[J]. Patterns, 2024, 5(5): 100988.
	[105] GIUDICI P, CENTURELLI M, TURCHETTA S. Artificial intelligence
	risk measurement[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 235:121220.
	[106] EASA. Artificial intelligence roadmap 2. 0 : human-centric approach
	to AI in aviation[R]. Cologne: EASA, 2023.
	[107] EASA. EASA Concept paper: first usable guidance for level 1 machine
	learning applications: a deliverable of the EASA AI roadmap [R].
	Cologne: EASA, 2021.
	[108] EASA. EASA Concept paper: guidance for level 1 & 2 machine learning applications: a deliverable of the EASA AI roadmap issue 02[R].
	Cologne: EASA, 2024.
	[109] EASA. Machine learning application approval[R]. Cologne: EASA,
	2024.
	[110] EASA. Ethics for AI in aviation: aviation professionals survey results
	2024/2025[R]. Cologne: EASA, 2025.
	[111] TRUMP D J. Unleashing American drone dominance executive order:
	14307[S]. Washington DC: The White House, 2025.
	[112] 尹泽勇, 丁水汀, 李果, 等. 航空发动机下一代适航规章制定
	策略和技术路径[J]. 中国工程科学, 2022, 24(4): 230-239.