民航机组特情处置能力综合评价研究

中国民航大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 39-44.

民航机组特情处置能力综合评价研究

李晔，李鹏飞，王朔，李姝，汪磊

（1.中国南方航空股份有限公司北京分公司，北京 101318； 2. 中国民航大学 a. 飞行分校；b. 中国民航航空公司人工智能重点实验室，天津 300300）

收稿日期:2020-10-21 修回日期:2020-10-21 接受日期:2020-07-20 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-11-28
作者简介:李晔（1973—），河南确山人，二级飞行员，硕士，研究方向为民航安全管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（U1733117）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项（3122019061）；装备预研基金项目（6142222190206）

Comprehensive evaluation on ability of handling emergency situation of civil aviation crew

LI Ye, LI Pengfei , WANG Shuo , LI Shu, WANG Lei

（1. Beijing Branch, China Southern Airlines, Beijing 101318, China; 2a. Flight Academy; 2b. Key Lab of Airlines Artificial Intelligence, CAUC, Tianjin 300300, China）

Received:2020-10-21 Revised:2020-10-21 Accepted:2020-07-20 Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 飞行员的特情处置能力与机组的安全表现直接相关，通过文献分析及专家访谈，将民航机组特情处置能力分为知识、技能和个体素质 3 个维度；进一步设计实施专家问卷，获得有效数据 26 份，应用熵权法确定指标权重，建立特情处置能力评价指标体系。云模型评价表明，N 公司机组特情处置能力处于良好水平。该指标体系可为选拔飞行员、开展相应循证培训提供参考。

关键词: , 民航机组, 特情处置能力, 能力评价, 飞行安全

Abstract: Pilot’s emergency situation handling ability is directly related to the safety performance of flight crew. Through document analyses and expert interviews, emergency situation handling ability of flight crews is divided into three dimensions including knowledge, skills and individual qualities; by further designing and distributing questionnaires, 26 valid questionnaires are obtained, indices weights are determined by applying of the entropy weight method, a complete evaluation index system of emergency situation handling ability is built. Combining with the scores of airline N, the evaluation result of cloud model show that the emergency situation handling ability of flight crews of airline N is in a good level. The current evaluation index system can provide reference for pilot selection and evidence-based training.

Key words: civil aviation crew, emergency situation handling ability, ability evaluation, flight safety

中图分类号:

V328

李晔 , 李鹏飞 , 王朔 , 李姝 , 汪磊 . 民航机组特情处置能力综合评价研究[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2021, 39(3): 39-44.

LI Ye, LI Pengfei , WANG Shuo , LI Shu, WANG Lei. Comprehensive evaluation on ability of handling emergency situation of civil aviation crew[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2021, 39(3): 39-44.

参考文献 32

[1]	International Civil Aviation Organization. State of global aviation safety2018[R]. Canada: ICAO, 2019.
[2]	孙瑞山, 刘冬梅, 汪磊. 对应分析在 CFIT 事故致因研究中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(2): 95-100.
[3]	杜红兵, 张庆庆. 民航飞行事故统计及原因分析[J]. 工业安全与环保,2016, 42(8): 17-20.
[4]	刘清贵. 警惕可控飞行撞地风险[N]. 中国民航报, 2017-08-07(4).
[5]	徐一超. 民机特情包线约束下自适应控制研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2019.
[6]	BEA. Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio deJaneiro-Paris[R]. Paris: BEA, 2012.
[7]	WRIGHT A E, JOHN A C, TIM G. The effect of an in-flight, emergencytraining program on crew confidence[J]. Air Medical Journal, 1994, 13(4):127-131.[8] 束泱泱. 特情处置中的心理品质分析[J]. 民航经济与技术, 2000(1):33-34.
[9]	孙明, 魏思东, 谭麒瑞. 运输机飞行特情处置模拟训练评判指标研究[J]. 装备制造技术, 2009(10): 54-55, 58.
[10]	SOHN S Y, JO Y K. A study on the student pilot′s mental workload dueto personality types of both instructor and student [J]. Ergonomics,2003, 46(15): 1566-1577.
[11]	GOETRES K M, MASCHKE M, Ei feldt H Ability requirements in coreaviation professions: job analyses of airline pilots and air traffic controllers[M]//GOETRESK M.Aviation Psychology: Practice and Research.New York: Routledge, 2004: 99-119.
[12]	FLIN R, MARAN N. Basic concepts for crew resource management andnon-technical skills[J]. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology,2015, 29(1): 27-39.
[13]	ICAO. Manual of evidence-Based training: Doc 9995[S]. Montreal:ICAO, 2013.
[14]	中国民用航空局飞行标准司.飞行运行作风:AC-121-FS-2018-130[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2018.
[15]	CRICHTON M T, FLIN R. Identifying and training non-technical skillsof nuclear emergency response teams[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2004,31(12): 1317-1330.
[16]	O’CONNOR P, O’DEA A, FLIN R, et al. Identifying the team skills required by nuclear power plant operations personnel[J]. InternationalJournal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2008, 38(11/12): 1028-1037.
[17]	SCHUMACHER S, KLEINMANN M, MELCHERS K G. Job requirements for control room jobs in nuclear power plants[J]. Safety Science,2011, 49(3): 394-405.
[18]	IMO. The Manila amendments to the annex to the international convention on standards of training, certification and watchkeeping for seafarers: STCW/CONF.2/33[R]. London: IMO, 2010.
[19]	张锦朋, 陈伟炯, 杲庆林, 等.航海人员的不安全行为分析与评价模型研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2005(10): 47-51, 3.
[20]	FASSBENDER C, GOETERS K M. Results of the ESA study on psychological selection of astronaut applicants for Columbus missions I: aptitude testing[J]. Acta Astronautica, 1992, 27: 131-138.
[21]	SANTY P A. Choosing the right stuff: The psychological selection of astronauts and cosmonauts（human evolution, be havior and intelligence）[M]. California: Santa Barbara Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group, 1994.
[22]	景晓路, 刘芳, 吴斌, 等. 航天员胜任特征分析与比较研究[J].航天医学与医学工程, 2007, 20(6) : 317-322.
[23]	HUNTER D R. Measuring general aviation pilot judgment using a situational judgment technique[J]. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2003, 13(4): 373-386.
[24]	TAYLOR J L, O'HARA R, MUMENTHALER M S, et al. Cognitive ability, expertise, and age differences in following airtraffic control instructions[J]. Psychology and Aging, 2005, 20(5): 117-133.
[25]	HUNTER D R. Risk perception and risk tolerance in aircraft pilots:DOT/FAA/AM-02/17[R]. America: Washington DC Office of AviationMedicine, FAA, 2002.
[26]	HUNTER D R. Measurement of hazardous attitudes among pilots[J]. TheInternational Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2005, 15(1): 23-43.
[27]	李灿, 辛玲. 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2008, 25(5): 541-544.
[28]	王清源, 潘旭海. 熵权法在重大危险源应急救援评估中的应用[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(3): 87-92.
[29]	冯运卿, 李雪梅, 李学伟. 基于熵权法与灰色关联分析的铁路安全综合评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2014, 14(2): 73-79.
[30]	李德毅. 知识表示中的不确定性[J] .中国工程科学, 2000, 2(10): 73-79.
[31]	王威威, 陈永锋. 基于云模型的 BIM 项目质量协同管理绩效评价[J].湘潭大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(1): 86-90.
[32]	International Air Transport Association. Data report for evidence-basedtraining: 978-92-9252-228-5[R]. Montreal-Geneva: IATA, 2014.