融合 AHM 理念的 MSG-3 分析逻辑内涵与应用

中国民航大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 59-64.

• 适航专栏 • 上一篇

融合 AHM 理念的 MSG-3 分析逻辑内涵与应用

黄俊，顾嘉旭

（1.中国民用航空上海适航审定中心，上海 200335；2.上海飞机客户服务有限公司，上海 200241）

收稿日期:2020-09-14 修回日期:2020-09-14 接受日期:2020-07-22 出版日期:2021-12-01 发布日期:2022-06-05
作者简介:黄俊（1984—），男，江苏南通人，高级工程师，学士，研究方向为 AEG 评审、飞机结构工程管理、持续适航文件编制等.

Logic connotation and application of MSG-3 analysis integrating AHM concept

HUANG Jun , GU Jiaxu

（1. Shanghai Aircraft Airworthiness Certification Center, CAAC, Shanghai 200335, China; 2. Shanghai Aircraft Customer Service Co., Ltd. Shanghai 200241, China）

Received:2020-09-14 Revised:2020-09-14 Accepted:2020-07-22 Online:2021-12-01 Published:2022-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国际维修审查委员会政策委员会（IMRBPB，international maintenance review board policy board）于 2018 年 4 月正式通过了 IP180，用于指导主制造商在制定计划维修要求时，将 MSG-3 与飞机健康管理（AHM，aircraft health monitoring）技术结合，以替代部分传统定期维修任务，提高维修效能。当前，中国主制造商未在机型设计之初考虑 AHM 系统的应用场景，在与 MSG-3 的结合过程中仍有不少前提条件需明确。基于对 MSG-3 和 IP180 的理解，解读 AHM 相关分析逻辑的技术要点和具体步骤，并识别制定飞机维修计划的关键环节，明确前提条件和实施要求，为 AHM 方案的真正落地实施提供参考。

关键词: 飞机健康管理（AHM）技术, MSG-3, 计划维修

Abstract: In April 2018, IP180 was officially adopted by International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board (IMRBPB) for guiding main manufacturers to replace traditional scheduled task and combined with MSG-3 and aircraft health management(AHM) techniques for improving maintenance efficiency. Currently, main manufacturers in China have not fully considered application scenarios of AHM system at the beginning of model design, and there are still some preconditions of combining AHM with MSG -3 that need clarification. Based on the knouledge of MSG-3 and IP180, technical key points and specific steps of AHM related analysis logic are elucidated, key links of aircraft maintenance planning are identified, preconditions and implementation requirements are clarified and reference for the implementation of AHM scheme is provided.

Key words: aircraft health management (AHM) technique, MSG-3, scheduled maintenance

中图分类号:

V267+ .31

黄俊 , 顾嘉旭 . 融合 AHM 理念的 MSG-3 分析逻辑内涵与应用 [J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2021, 39(6): 59-64.

HUANG Jun , GU Jiaxu. Logic connotation and application of MSG-3 analysis integrating AHM concept[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2021, 39(6): 59-64.

参考文献 16

[1]	王兆兵, 高丽敏. 大数据时代的民机健康管理技术革新[J]. 航空维修与工程, 2018(5): 20-25.
[2]	熊天翔. 飞机健康管理综述[J]. 科技资讯, 2011(29): 238, 240.
[3]	LE D D, GHOSHAL A, CUEVAS E. Condition-based maintenance plus and maintenance credit validation[C]//International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring: From Condition-based Maintenance to Autonomous Structures, Stanford, CA, USA, September 13-15, 2011: 1-8.
[4]	VOGL G W, WEISS B A, DONMEZ M A. Standards related to prognostics and health management (PHM) for manufacturing: NISTR-8012[R]. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2014.
[5]	蒋觉义, 李幡, 曾照洋. 故障预测与健康管理标准体系研究[J]. 测控技术, 2013, 32(11): 1-5, 9.
[6]	L,HR A, BUDERATH M. Evolving the data management backbone: binary OSA -CBM and code generation for OSA -EAI [C]//European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, September 29-October 2, 2014: 758-767.
[7]	SAE. Aircraft gas turbine engine health management system development and integration guide: ARP5120[S]. Warrendale: SAE, 2016.
[8]	高秋颖, 钱红余. 航空发动机预测健康管理（PHM）技术[J]. 测控技术, 2013, 32(S1): 220-223.
[9]	LARDER B D, DAVIS M W. HUMS condition based maintenance credit validation[C]//American Helicopter Society 63rd Annual Forum, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, May 1-3, 2007: 1-8.
[10]	曾声奎, PECHT M, 吴际. 故障预测与健康管理（PHM）技术的现状与发展[J]. 航空学报, 2005, 26(5): 626-632.
[11]	蓝楠. 关于大数据技术在国内 MRO 领域发展现状的调查“: 四大航”的机务大数据技术应用实践[J]. 航空维修与工程, 2017(8): 18-22.
[12]	PARTIM A P, DHAVAL M, BUDERATH D M. A certifiable approach towards integrated solution for aircraft readiness management[C]//European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, September 29-October 2, 2014: 1-11.
[13]	H,LZEL N, SCHR,DER C, SCHILLING T. A maintenance packaging and scheduling optimization method for future aircraft[C]//Air Transport and Operations Symposium, Delft, Netherlands, 2012: 1-11.
[14]	ATA. Operator/manufacturer scheduled maintenance development, volume 1-fixed wing aircraft: ATA MSG-3 vol 1[S]. Washington DC: ATA,2018.
[15]	IMRBPB. Aircraft health monitoring(AHM) integration in MSG-3: IP180[S]. Shanghai: IMRBPB, 2018.
[16]	RTCA. Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification: DO-178C[S]. Washington DC: RTCA, 2011.

融合 AHM 理念的 MSG-3 分析逻辑内涵与应用

Logic connotation and application of MSG-3 analysis integrating AHM concept

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 16

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价