航空快件分类分级安检风险评估研究

中国民航大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 44-50.

航空快件分类分级安检风险评估研究

中国民航大学安全科学与工程学院，天津 300300

收稿日期:2024-05-04 修回日期:2023-06-25 出版日期:2025-11-17 发布日期:2025-11-17
作者简介:赵振武（1977— ），男，天津人，副教授，博士，研究方向为民航安全管理研究
基金资助:
天津市教委科研计划项目（2021SK025）

Research on risk assessment of classification and grading security inspection for

aviation express

College of Safety Science and Engineering, CAUC, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2024-05-04 Revised:2023-06-25 Online:2025-11-17 Published:2025-11-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为应对不断增加的航空快件安检需求，保证航空快件运输时效，实现航空快件高效安检、安全运输，在传统安

检模式的基础上，首先，本文提出全货机航空快件分类分级安检模式，从威胁性、脆弱性、后果严重性 3 方面对

安检系统进行风险评估；其次，本文主要结合搜索-决策模型及安检员工作表现模型对脆弱性指标漏检率进行

定量计算，威胁性及后果严重性指标数据来源于事故数据统计规律。风险评估结果表明：全货机航空快件分类

分级安检系统风险值比传统快件安检系统降低了 29.77%，且在判图时间区间内，增加安检员决策时间对系统

漏检率和误检率影响较小，这可为全货机实施分类分级安检策略提供理论指导。

关键词:

航空快件, 分类分级, 安检系统, 风险评估

Abstract:

To cope with the increasing demand for security inspection for aviation express, ensure the timeliness of aviation

express transportation, and achieve efficient security inspection and safe transportation of aviation express, on the

basis of the traditional security inspection mode, a classification and grading security inspection mode for all cargo aircraft aviation express is firstly proposed in this paper, and the risk assessment of the security inspection

system is conducted from three aspects, including threat, vulnerability, and consequence severity. Secondly, this

paper mainly combines the search-decision model and the work performance model of security inspector to

quantitatively calculate the vulnerability indicator missing rate, and the data of threat and consequence severity

indicators are derived from the statistical laws of accident data. The risk assessment results indicate that the risk

value of the classification and grading security inspection system for full cargo aircraft aviation express is reduced

by 29.77% compared to the traditional express security inspection systems, and increasing the time for security

inspectors to judge images within the time interval has little impact on the system′s missed detection rate and

false detection rate. This can provide theoretical guidance for implementing classification and grading security

inspection strategies for full cargo aircraft.

Key words:

aviation express, classification and grading, security inspection system, risk assessment

中图分类号:

V353
X949

赵振武, 李艳娇.

航空快件分类分级安检风险评估研究

[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2025, 43(5): 44-50.

ZHAO Zhenwu, LI Yanjiao.

Research on risk assessment of classification and grading security inspection for

aviation express

[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2025, 43(5): 44-50.

参考文献 9

[1]	梁晓康. 航空货运与快递业的有效合作策略探究[J]. 现代商业,
	2021, 14(6): 26-28.
[2]	顺丰控股股份有限公司. 2022 年顺丰控股股份有限公司年度报
告[R]	深圳: 顺丰控股股份有限公司, 2022.
[3]	DOMINGUES S, MACARIO R, PAUWELS T, et al. An assessment of
	the regulation of air cargo security in Europe：a Belgian case study [J].
	Journal of Air Transport Management, 2014, 34: 131-139.
[4]	AMORIM DA CUNHA D, MACARIO R, REIS V. Keeping cargo security costs down：a risk-based approach to air cargo airport security in
	small and medium airports[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management,
	2017, 61: 115-122.
[5]	TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. Air cargo security roadmap[R]. US: Transportation Security Administration, 2021.
[6]	郁志翔. 从最后一公里重新衡量航空物流企业改革方向[J]. 空运商务, 2020, 16(1): 18-21.
[7]	FENG Q M, SAHIN H, KAPUR K C. Designing airport checked-baggage-screening strategies considering system capability and reliability[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(2): 618-627.
[8]	赵振武, 邢肖肖. 航空货物分类分级安检模式安全性分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(8): 3172-3179.

[9]	廖佑莲, 谢明．疫情下的航空快递企业物流模式创新探讨[J]．发明与创新(职业教育), 2021, 8(8): 187-188.


	[10] 姚程远. M 企业航空快递空中运输路径优化研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021.


	[11] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会．邮政业术语: GB/T 10757—2011[S]．北京：中国标准出版社, 2011．


	[12] 贺炜．海关商品编码归类的实用技巧[J]．物流技术, 2005, 24(12): 95-96．


	[13] U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. Risk management fundamentals, homeland security risk management doctrine[R]. U.S.: United States Department of Homeland Security. 2011.


	[14] 国家邮政局. 邮件快件智能 X 射线安全检查设备技术要求: YZ/T0177—2021[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2021.


	[15] FLETCHER K. Aviation security: a case for risk-based passenger screening[D]. U.S.: Naval Postgraduate School, 2011.


	[16] DRURY C G. Inspection of sheet materials-model and data[J]. The


	Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1975, 17(3): 257-265．


	[17] DRURY C G, FORSMAN D R. Measurement of the speed accuracy operating characteristic for visual search[J]. Ergonomics, 1996, 39(1): 41-45.


	[18] VAN MAANEN L, KATSIMPOKIS D, DILENE VAN CAMPEN A． Fast


	and slow errors: logistic regression to identify patterns in accuracy-response time relationships[J]． Behavior Research Methods, 2019, 51(5):2378-2389．


	[19] KOLLER S M, DRURY C G, SCHWANINGER A. Change of search


	time and non-search time in X-ray baggage screening due to training[J].


	Ergonomics, 2009, 52(6): 644-656.


	[20] BOSSE T, BOTH F, VAN LAMBALGEN R, et al． An agent model for a


	human′s functional state and performance [C]//2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM


	International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent


	Technology, December 9 -12, 2008, Sydney, NSW, Australia． IEEE,2008: 302-307．


	[21] KOBZA J E, JACOBSON S H． Addressing the dependency problem in


	access security system architecture design[J]． Risk Analysis, 1996, 16(6): 801-812．


	[22] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会．微剂量 X 射线安


	全检查设备第 3 部分: 透射式货物安全检查设备: GB 15208.3—2018[S]．北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018．


	[23] SWANN L, POPOVIC V, WIREDJA D. Visual inspection problem solving strategies at different experience levels[J]. Applied Ergonomics,2024, 118(3): 104-115.