中国民航大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 48-53.

• 未来机场及智能装备 • 上一篇    下一篇

机场韧性内涵与评价方法 

  

  1. 中国民航大学交通科学与工程学院,天津 300300
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-02 修回日期:2024-12-24 出版日期:2026-04-30 发布日期:2026-05-06
  • 作者简介:齐麟(1982— ),男,山西太原人,教授,博士,研究方向为机场工程.
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFB2600500);中国民航大学研究生科研创新项目(2021YJS054)

Connotation and evaluation method of airport resilience

  1. College of Transportation Science and Engineering, CAUC, Tianjin 300300,China
  • Received:2024-06-02 Revised:2024-12-24 Online:2026-04-30 Published:2026-05-06

摘要: 在国家推进韧性交通的背景下,本文全面考虑机场系统构成的各维度,以机场的高效运行为目标,从机场技 术韧性和管理韧性两方面提出机场韧性的内涵,建立机场韧性评价模型,基于层次分析法和专家打分法提 出机场韧性的评价方法。以北方某 4E 级机场为例,对其韧性进行评价,结果表明,该机场总体韧性得分为 8.20,评价为优;其中技术韧性得分为 8.24,评价为优;管理韧性得分为 7.98,评价为良。最后,针对该机场韧 性薄弱的部分提出了相应的提升措施。

关键词: 机场运行, 韧性评价, 技术韧性, 管理韧性, 层次分析法(AHP)

Abstract: In the context of the national promotion of resilient transportation, this paper comprehensively considers the various dimensions of the airport system, aims at the efficient operation of the airport, puts forward the connotation of airport resilience from two aspects: technical resilience and management resilience, and establishes an airport resilience evaluation model based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and expert scoring method. Taking a 4E-class airport in northern China as an example, this paper evaluates its resilience. The results show that the overall resilience score of the airport is 8.20, evaluated as excellent; the technical resilience score is 8.24, evaluated as excellent; and management resilience score is 7.98, evaluated as good. Finally, corresponding improvement measures are proposed for the weak links of airport resilience

Key words: airport operation, resilience evaluation, technical resilience, management resilience, analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

中图分类号: